• My Dashboard My Education Find an Ophthalmologist
  • Home
  • Coronavirus
  • For Ophthalmologists
    • Meetings
      • AAO 2022
        • Meeting Information
          • Past and Future Meetings
          • Mobile Meeting Guide
          • Contact Information
          • Annual Meeting News
          • Health and Safety
          • Policies and Disclaimers
        • Program
          • Program Highlights
          • Subspecialty Day
          • Virtual Meeting
          • Program Committees
          • CME
          • Meeting Archives
        • Expo
        • Registration
        • Hotels & Travel
          • Hotel Reservation Information
          • Chicago
          • International Attendees
          • Hotel Meeting Space
        • Presenter Central
          • Presenter Central
          • Abstract Selection Process
          • Submission Policies
          • Subject Classification/Topics
          • Instruction Courses and Skills Transfer Labs
          • Papers and Posters
          • Videos
          • Grand Rounds Symposium
          • Program Participant and Faculty Guidelines
          • Faculty Development Program
        • Exhibitors
          • Exhibitor Central
          • Exhibitor Portal Information
          • Exhibitor Prospectus
          • New Exhibiting Companies
          • Exhibitor Resources
          • International Exhibitors
          • Promotional Opportunities
          • Exhibitor Hotel Reservations
      • Mid-Year Forum
        • Registration and Travel
        • Congressional Advocacy Day
        • Advocacy Ambassador Program
        • Program
        • Schedule
        • Sponsored Attendees
        • News
      • Codequest
        • Codequest Instructors
        • Claim Codequest CME or CEU Credit
      • Eyecelerator
    • Clinical Education
      • COVID-19
      • Education
        • Browse All Education
        • Courses
        • Cases
        • Learning Plans
        • Interactive
        • Focal Points
        • Wills Eye Manual
        • Disease Reviews
        • Clinical Webinars
        • Diagnose This
        • Self-Assessments
        • Educational Centers
          • Glaucoma Education Center
          • Pediatric Ophthalmology Education Center
          • Laser Surgery Education Center
          • Myopia Resources
          • Oculofacial Plastic Surgery Center
          • Redmond Ethics Center
      • Journals
      • Guidelines
        • Browse All Practice Guidelines
        • Preferred Practice Patterns
        • Clinical Statements
        • Compendium Guidelines
        • Complementary Therapy Assessments
        • Medical Information Technology
        • Ophthalmic Technology Assessments
        • Patient Safety Statements
        • Choosing Wisely
        • Low Vision
        • Eye Care for Older Adults
        • Eye Disease Statistics
        • About the Hoskins Center
      • Video and Image Library
        • Browse All Videos
        • Clinical and Surgical Videos
        • Presentations and Lectures
        • 1-Minute Videos
        • Master Class Videos
        • Basic Skills Videos
        • Interviews
        • Images
        • Submit an Image
        • Submit a Video
      • Podcasts
        • Browse All Audio and Podcasts
        • Experts InSight
        • Ophthalmology Journal
      • News
        • Browse All Clinical News
        • Editors' Choice
        • Headlines
        • Current Insight
      • CME Central
        • Browse All CME Activities
        • Claim CME Credit and View Transcript
        • CME Planning Resources
        • Complete Your Financial Disclosure
        • Joint Sponsorship Portal
        • LEO Continuing Education Recognition Award
        • Safe ER/LA Opioid Prescribing
        • Check Your Industry Payment Records
      • MOC
      • Resident Education
        • Resident Education Home
        • Browse All Resident Content
          • Courses
          • Flashcards
          • Interactive Cases and Simulations
          • Videos
          • Webinars
        • OKAP and Board Exam Resources
          • OKAP Exam
          • Board Prep Resources
          • OKAP and Board Review Presentations
          • Study Flashcards
        • Cataract Master
        • Diversity and Inclusion Education
        • News and Advice from YO Info
        • Pediatric Ophthalmology Education Center
        • PGY-1 and PGY-2 Resources
        • Simulation in Resident Education
    • Membership
      • Join
      • Renew
      • Current Member
      • Volunteer
      • Physician Wellness
      • Member Directory
      • Member Obituaries
      • AAOE Membership
    • Advocacy
      • Advocacy News
      • Get Involved
        • Ways to Give
        • How to Get Involved
        • Congressional Advocacy
        • Support the Academy's Agenda
        • Research Legislation
        • Find Your Legislators
        • I Am an Advocate
        • Advocacy at Home
        • Advocate Tools
        • Best Practices for Advocating at Home
        • Social Media Toolkit
        • Letter to Editor
        • Town Hall Guide
        • Guide to Engaging With New Lawmakers
        • Resources
        • Attending a Political Fundraiser
      • OPHTHPAC
        • About Us
        • Join OPHTHPAC
        • OPHTHPAC Blog
      • Surgical Scope Fund
        • Support Surgery By Surgeons
        • Surgery By Surgeons Blog
    • Publications
      • EyeNet Magazine
        • Latest Issue
        • Archive
        • Subscribe
        • Advertise
        • Write For Us
        • Corporate Lunches
        • Contact
        • MIPS 2022
      • Focal Points
      • Ophthalmology
      • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
      • Ophthalmology Retina
      • YO Info
      • Scope
    • Subspecialties
      • Cataract/Anterior Segment
      • Comprehensive Ophthalmology
      • Cornea/External Disease
      • Glaucoma
      • Neuro-Ophthalmology/Orbit
      • Ocular Pathology/Oncology
      • Oculoplastics/Orbit
      • Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus
      • Refractive Management/Intervention
      • Retina/Vitreous
      • Uveitis
    • IRIS Registry
      • About
      • Using the Registry
        • User Guide
        • Medicare Reporting
        • Maintenance of Certification
        • Non-EHR Reporting
      • Sign Up
        • Application Process
        • Why Participate
        • Once You've Applied: Getting Started
        • What Practices Are Saying About the Registry
      • Requirements
        • EHR Systems
        • Data & Technical Needs
      • Research
      • Registry Dashboard
      • News
      • Medicare & MIPS
    • Medicare Information
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
  • For Practice Management
    • Managing Your Practice
      • Managing Your Practice Topics
      • Coronavirus Resources
      • Reopening & Recovery
      • Practice Forms Library
      • Practice Management News and Advice
      • AAOE-Talk
      • Video Library
      • Ophthalmology Job Center
      • Benchmarking and Salary Tools
      • Academy Consultations
      • Consultant Directory
    • Coding
      • Coding Topics
      • Codequest Events
      • Ask the Coding Experts
      • Coding Updates and Resources
      • Coding for Injectable Drugs
      • EM Documentation
      • ICD-10-CM
      • Ophthalmic Coding Specialist (OCS) Exam
      • Retina
      • Savvy Coder
    • Webinars and Events
      • Annual Meeting
        • Master Classes
        • Coding Sessions
        • Submit an Instruction Course
      • Codequest Courses
      • Mid-Year Forum
      • Webinar Recordings
      • Upcoming Webinars
    • IRIS Registry
      • Merit-Based Incentive Payment
    • Medicare and MIPS
      • MIPS
        • Quality
        • Promoting Interoperability
        • Improvement Activities
        • Cost
        • Avoid a Penalty
      • Resources
      • Medicare Participation Options
      • Medicare Advantage Plans
      • New Medicare Card
      • Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (PECOS)
    • Regulatory Compliance
      • HIPPA Resources
      • Office of Inspector General
      • Audits
      • OSHA
    • AAOE Membership
      • Join AAOE
      • Membership Benefits
      • Renew/Pay Dues
    • About AAOE
      • AAOE Board of Directors
      • AAOE Content Committee
      • Volunteer Opportunities
  • For Public & Patients
    • Eye Health A-Z
    • Symptoms
    • Glasses & Contacts
    • Tips & Prevention
    • News
    • Ask an Ophthalmologist
    • Patient Stories
    • No Cost Eye Exams
    • Español
      • A - Z de Salud Ocular
      • Síntomas
      • Anteojos y Lentes de Contacto
      • Consejos y Prevención
      • Noticias
      • Relatos de Pacientes
      • Exámenes de la vista sin costo
      • English
  • AAO 2022
    • Meeting Information
      • Past and Future Meetings
      • Mobile Meeting Guide
      • Contact Information
      • Annual Meeting News
      • Health and Safety
      • Policies and Disclaimers
    • Program
      • Program Highlights
      • Subspecialty Day
      • Virtual Meeting
      • Program Committees
      • CME
      • Meeting Archives
    • Expo
    • Registration
    • Hotels & Travel
      • Hotel Reservation Information
      • Chicago
      • International Attendees
      • Hotel Meeting Space
    • Presenter Central
      • Presenter Central
      • Abstract Selection Process
      • Submission Policies
      • Subject Classification/Topics
      • Instruction Courses and Skills Transfer Labs
      • Papers and Posters
      • Videos
      • Grand Rounds Symposium
      • Program Participant and Faculty Guidelines
      • Faculty Development Program
    • Exhibitors
      • Exhibitor Central
      • Exhibitor Portal Information
      • Exhibitor Prospectus
      • New Exhibiting Companies
      • Exhibitor Resources
      • International Exhibitors
      • Promotional Opportunities
      • Exhibitor Hotel Reservations
  • About
    • Who We Are
      • What We Do
      • About Ophthalmology
      • The Eye Care Team
      • Ethics and the Academy
      • History
      • Museum of Vision
      • Values
    • Governance
      • Council
      • Board of Trustees
      • Committees
      • Academy Past Presidents
      • Secretariats
      • Elections
      • Academy Blog
      • Academy Staff Leadership
    • Leadership Development
    • Awards
      • Laureate Recognition Award
      • Outstanding Advocate Award
      • Outstanding Humanitarian Service Award
      • International Blindness Prevention Award
      • Distinguished Service Award
      • Guests of Honor
      • Secretariat Award
      • Straatsma Award
      • Achievement Award Program
      • Artemis Award
      • EnergEYES Award
      • International Education Award
      • International Scholar Award
      • Commitment to Advocacy Award
      • Visionary Society Award
    • Financial Relationships
    • Policy Statements
    • Related Organizations
      • Subspecialty/Specialized Interest Society Directory
      • State Society Directory
      • Subspecialty/Specialized Interest Society Meetings
      • State Society Meetings
      • Resources for Societies
    • Year in Review
      • 2020 Year in Review
  • Foundation
    • About
      • 2020-2021 Annual Report
      • Annual Report Archives
      • News From the Chair
      • Foundation Staff
    • Our Impact
      • Partners for Sight
      • Donor Spotlights
      • Global Ophthalmic Community
      • Sponsorships
      • Patients and the Public
    • Giving Options
      • Our Supporters
      • Estate and Planned Giving
      • Ophthalmic Business Council
      • Parke Center Campaign
      • Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Campaign
      • Museum of the Eye Campaign
    • Orbital Gala
      • Why Attend
      • Photo Recap
      • Corporate Support Opportunities
      • Tribute Gifts
      • Silent Auction
      • Corporate Sponsors
    • Donate
    • Museum of the Eye Campaign
      • Museum Supporters
  • Museum of the Eye
    • Visit
    • What's On
      • Museum Galleries
      • Special Exhibitions
      • Current Events
      • Past Events
    • Explore
      • Research and Resources
      • Collection Search
      • Previous Exhibits
      • Oral Histories
      • Biographies
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
    • Donate
    • About the Museum
      • Museum Blog
  • Young Ophthalmologists
    • YO Info
    • Learn to Bill
    • Engage with the Academy
  • Senior Ophthalmologists
    • Scope
    • Practice Transitions
  • International Ophthalmologists
    • Global Programs and Resources for National Societies
    • Awards
    • Global Outreach
  • Residents
  • Medical Students
×
Shop
Log In Create an Account
  • For Ophthalmologists
  • For Practice Management
  • For Public & Patients
  • Coronavirus
  • About
  • Foundation
  • Museum of the Eye
  • Who We Are
    • The Academy: Who We Are
    • The Academy: What We Do
    • About Ophthalmology
    • The Eye Care Team
    • Ethics and the Academy
    • Academy's History
    • Museum of the Eye
    • Academy Values

  • Governance
    • Governance
    • Council
    • Board of Trustees
    • Committees
    • Academy Past Presidents
    • Strategic Goals
    • Secretariats
    • Elections
    • Academy Blog
    • Academy Staff Leadership
  • Leadership Development
  • Awards
    • Academy Awards Program
    • Laureate Recognition Award
    • Outstanding Advocate Award
    • Outstanding Humanitarian Service Award
    • International Blindness Prevention Award
    • Distinguished Service Award
    • Guests of Honor
    • Special Recognition Award
    • Secretariat Award
    • Straatsma Award
    • Achievement Award Program
    • Artemis Award
    • EnergEYES Award
    • International Education Award
    • International Scholar Award
    • Commitment to Advocacy Award
  • Financial Relationships
  • Policy Statements
  • Related Organizations
    • Related Organizations
    • Subspecialty/Specialized Interest Society Meetings
    • State Society Meetings
    • Subspecialty/Specialized Interest Society Directory
    • State Society Directory
    • Resources for State Societies
    • About /
    • Policy Statements /
    • Guidelines for Refractive Surgery Advertising
  • Guidelines for Refractive Surgery Advertising

  • A joint statement of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

    Statement of Purpose:

    These guidelines are designed to assist ophthalmologists in providing truthful, informative advertising of refractive surgery. In addition to their ethical obligations, ophthalmologists must be mindful of the legal obligations they have in connection with the promotion of their services.

    These guidelines are not intended to address every possible advertising claim that could be made in support of refractive surgery. The guidelines address specific types of claims that could confuse consumers and/or have been subject to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) review. Examples of permissible claims as well as claims that might be considered confusing or misleading are provided.

    Legal Framework:

    The Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits false and deceptive advertising, as do similar state laws. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act also prohibits false and misleading advertisements for restricted medical devices, including Federal Drug Administration (FDA)- approved lasers used for LASIK surgery. Advertising that is literally true but that conveys a misleading impression to reasonable consumers may be unlawful. Claims made implicitly in advertising, as well as those made explicitly, can give rise to deception. Deception can also occur through the omission of information if the absence of the information causes the advertisement to convey an inaccurate impression about a material fact, one that is likely to affect consumer conduct or decisions with respect to the service or product at issue. Thus, ophthalmologists should ensure that statements made directly or by implication in informational, promotional, and advertising materials are accurate and are not likely to deceive consumers. This is especially true in testimonial ads. Ophthalmologists are responsible for unlawful or deceptive claims made during testimonials that are used in their promotion and advertising materials. In addition, the FDA’s premarket approval orders might contain certain conditions of approval that could include requirements that physicians or companies provide specific risk information in promotional materials.

    The FTC has primary jurisdiction over advertising of health care services, over-the-counter drugs, and devices. The FDA has jurisdiction over product labeling for prescription drugs and medical devices. It also has jurisdiction over the advertising of prescription drugs and restricted medical devices. 

    One issue of current interest concerns physicians’ advertising of FDA-approved medical devices for use in “off-label” surgical applications. A physician’s decision to use an FDA- approved and legally marketed device on a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate physician-patient relationship (e.g., using the excimer laser outside the scope of the approved labeling) is considered to be within the practice of medicine exception. The FDA recognizes that physicians are permitted by professional license to use an approved drug or device for another use that they believe is appropriate for diagnostic or treatment purposes. Physicians should be aware, however, that advertising the off-label use of these specific FDA-approved devices is prohibited and is not protected under the practice of medicine exception. Off-label use may be described in peer-review articles and textbooks.

    Under FDA regulations, advertising of FDA-approved devices (e.g., excimer lasers) by brand name and model to the public is permissible as long as the physician, manufacturer, and distributor provide a brief statement of the device’s intended uses and all relevant warnings, precautions, contraindications, and side effects in the advertisement. Informed consent is regulated by the states. In addition, the FTC can assert jurisdiction over statements made in informed consent forms.

    State licensing authorities also regulate physician advertising and can impose disciplinary action against physicians who make claims of superior quality of care or otherwise engage in false and deceptive advertising. In addition, every state has general laws and rules against false and misleading commercial claims. Physicians should familiarize themselves with applicable state laws and regulations in this area.

    Definition of Advertising

    In addition to print, radio, and television ads, other material such as patient informational brochures, seminars, and videos may be considered advertising with respect to these laws. Under the Federal Trade Commission Act, Internet ads also are viewed as advertising. Privileged discussions between physicians and their patients are generally not regulated by the FTC, but they may have other legal or ethical implications. Irrespective of whether seminars and brochures may be considered advertising by the FTC, physicians do have a responsibility to adequately inform patients about other medical treatment options. In addition, the FDA has a definition for labeling and its jurisdiction extends over certain materials (e.g., a patient brochure) that the FTC might consider advertising for its own jurisdictional purposes. In such situations, physicians and companies are responsible for complying with both agencies’ requirements.

    Accountability

    Physicians and other advertisers are legally responsible for the truth and accuracy of their advertising, even if it is prepared by an ad agency or other third party.

    Substantiation

    True and substantiated health claims help prevent injury to consumers. Medical advertisers are held to a higher standard than those who advertise consumer products that are not health related, particularly with respect to surgical procedures. The FTC requires that advertisers have a “reasonable basis” for advertising claims at the time they are made. With respect to health and safety claims for refractive surgical procedures such as LASIK, this will usually require “competent and reliable” scientific evidence that may include the physician’s own outcomes alone or in combination with other clinical studies, depending on the claim. Such clinical evidence is generally considered to be stronger if the study has been peer reviewed and/or replicated in other studies. The research must be relevant to the service and benefit being advertised. In addition, the advertiser must have adequate substantiation for a claim at the time the claim is made. Anecdotal evidence is not adequate. Advertisers are responsible for all expressed and reasonably implied claims. Qualifying information must be disclosed if necessary to prevent deception. All disclosures must be sufficiently clear and conspicuous within the advertisement so that consumers are able to read and understand them.

    Informed Consent

    Advertising need not, and as a practical matter cannot, incorporate all of the elements of appropriate informed consent disclosures. FTC staff has stated that certain advertising claims may require disclosure of material information appearing in informed consent forms (see below, Example 1, Safety Claims). Also, advertising may not contradict disclosures of risk made in informed consent forms, and informed consent forms will not compensate, legally or ethically, for misleading statements made in advertising.

    Testimonials

    Advertisers cannot make claims indirectly, for example through a testimonial that they could not substantiate if made directly. A patient endorsement or testimonial will be construed by the FTC in two ways: (1) as making the performance, safety, health-benefit, or efficacy claim that underlies the testimonial; and (2) as a representation that the particular patient’s experience is typical or representative of the experiences generally achieved by the physician’s patients, unless there is a clear and conspicuous disclosure of the results generally achieved by the users of the product or device. Therefore, patient testimonials must be supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates both the underlying efficacy claim and the claim that the result is representative or typical of that experienced by other patients. In addition, physicians should be aware that some states prohibit the use of patient testimonials by physicians. Physicians are advised to check their state laws and regulations on the use of testimonials in advertising.

    MD/Expert Endorsements

    Physician experts may endorse substantiated efficacy claims for products or services as long as the physician is qualified to evaluate the service, provides an independent evaluation, and discloses in the ad any personal or financial connection to the sponsor of the advertised product that would be important for consumers to know in considering the expert endorsement.

    Advertising Claims

    Prospective refractive surgery patients have differing needs and expectations, and they may experience differing surgical outcomes. Accordingly, advertising claims are not a substitute for discussions between the ophthalmic surgeon and a prospective surgery patient regarding the patient’s own needs and expectations and the range of possible outcomes.

    Efficacy Claims

    Example 1: This ad appears on the Internet. The banner read, “Throw Away Your Glasses!” A reasonable consumer could infer from this ad that he or she will be permanently free of all forms of corrective lenses (for presbyopia and hyperopia as well as myopia) as a result of the surgery. Even if the ad makes reference to nearsightedness, there is a substantial risk that a significant number of consumers would infer from the ad that if they were to undergo the procedure, they would achieve 20/20 vision and would be free of glasses, including glasses for reading or occasional use. Since the surgeon cannot guarantee that the prospective patient would be permanently free from all glasses, the claim is subject to legal challenge. 

    Example 2: A print ad headline states, “Throw Away Your Glasses” or features a drawing of spectacles within a circle with a line crossed through it. Other text within the ad states that refractive surgery “may correct your nearsightedness and astigmatism and may eliminate your need for glasses or contacts.” Although the use of the word “may” is intended to qualify the “no more glasses” claim, the claim is likely to be understood by consumers to be as unqualified as the claim in Example 1, in light of the more prominent headline or drawing. To avoid confusion, the overall message of an ad should not be inconsistent with the “fine-print” qualifiers. A further modification of the above claim, such as “may correct your nearsightedness and astigmatism and may reduce your dependence on glasses or contacts for many activities,” avoids possible ambiguities about the need for reading glasses or glasses for occasional use.

    Example 3: A radio ad includes the text “See naturally with refractive surgery!” The reasonable consumer would interpret “seeing naturally,” or similar terms such as “seeing clearly,” to mean “seeing without glasses.” Again, this kind of claim should be avoided for the reasons cited for Examples 1 and 2.

    Example 4: An ad picturing a smiling patient and physician states, “If you can read the small print but can’t see well at a distance, visit Drs. Smith and Jones to learn more about LASIK – our typical nearsighted patient – after refractive surgery – no longer needs glasses for many activities.” Such an ad is acceptable. It suggests that LASIK will treat only nearsightedness and informs consumers about the possible need for glasses for other activities.

    Example 5: An ad states, “98% of our patients see 20/40 or better postoperatively – good enough to pass a driver’s test in most states!” Since the ad explicitly claims a result for a particular physician group’s patients, the physicians will need a study or analysis of patient records to substantiate the claim. In addition, this ad might be understood by some consumers to mean that since they can pass a driver’s vision exam, they might not need to wear glasses for other activities. This potential problem with the ad could be eliminated by a reference to the fact that patients may still need or desire glasses for some activities.

    Comparative Efficacy Claims

    Example 1: An ad states, “This laser is ranked highest by the FDA.” Advertisers may not make unsubstantiated comparative claims about lasers. The FDA does not rate devices comparatively.

    Example 2: An ad states, “We use a scanning laser so that you get the best results.” This implies that scanning lasers produce better results than nonscanning ones, and such a statement should be avoided unless the physician has competent and reliable scientific evidence (i.e., comparative clinical evidence) to support it.

    Example 3: An ad states, “Our (LASIK) surgeons are more experienced than any of their colleagues in (Florida).” Unless the physician has reliable, current evidence of the number of LASIK procedures performed by each refractive surgeon in the claimed region, this advertising tactic should be avoided.

    Safety Claims

    Example 1: An ad states, “Find out more about LASIK—the safe and easy alternative to glasses!” The terms “safe” and “safe and easy” have attracted the concern of the FTC and FDA, as have promotional materials that fail to disclose certain significant risks associated with the surgeries that are important to a prospective patient. Generally, it is not appropriate for an ad to state that LASIK is safe and easy. Any ad that suggests that LASIK is safe should, at a minimum, include a qualifying statement such as the following: “Like all surgery, LASIK surgery has some risks; we will discuss these with you during your consultation.” Depending on the context of the safety claim, such an ad may also need to contain information about any significant risks associated with the surgery.

    Example 2: A print ad states that, “unlike other procedures, PRK laser vision correction doesn’t involve knives or cuts to the eye.” Although it is true that the excimer laser does not use a blade to make incisions on the surface of the eye, the statement could be misleading to consumers by suggesting that PRK is a noninvasive procedure. It is not appropriate to claim or suggest expressly or through use of euphemisms such as “treatment,” “therapy,” “vision correction,” or “enhancement” that PRK is anything other than an invasive surgical procedure. While it may be appropriate to differentiate between refractive procedures in order to inform consumers, it should be done in a way so as not to be misleading; PRK and LASIK are surgical procedures, and this should be made clear to the reader of the ad.

    Example 3: An ad states, “The Food and Drug Administration has Determined that the Excimer Laser We Use Is Safe and Effective for LASIK.” Such an ad is acceptable. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act was amended to allow references to the FDA- approved status of any medical device in advertisements.

    Permanence and Predictability Claims

    Example 1: An ad states, “Achieve permanent vision correction with refractive surgery!” A reasonable consumer could assume “permanent” to mean that their postsurgical refractive result will remain stable throughout their lifetime. The FTC staff has raised questions about the possibility of regression, drift, and instability long-term. It has objected to permanency claims because it believes that studies of modern refractive surgery techniques available at the time of their review did not adequately substantiate such claims.

    The promise of a “lifetime commitment” in some LASIK ads likely overstates providers’ ability to correct every postsurgical problem that arises over the long term. At this time, physicians considering making claims of permanency or predictability should be aware that the FTC will carefully scrutinize this advertising. Accordingly, physicians should avoid permanency claims unless they are able to substantiate the claims on the basis of their own surgical outcomes alone or in combination with current scientific evidence.

    Example 2: “Visit the Smith Laser Center and leave with 20/20 vision!” This ad is problematic. A reasonable consumer could interpret this advertisement to mean that the surgeon can guarantee, preoperatively, exactly what the patient’s surgical outcome will be (i.e., that refractive surgery results are predictable.) To advertise surgical predictability, physicians must be able to substantiate that surgical outcomes are predictable in virtually all of their cases.

    The use of ranges (e.g., 80 percent of our patients have 20/20 vision following surgery) is acceptable if the surgeon can substantiate the claim.

    Success Rate Claims 

    Example 1: “90% of LASIK patients achieve 20/40 vision or better.” If this claim is based on a clinical study, the surgeon making the claim will need to ensure that the study is scientifically reliable and that he or she is performing the same procedure using the same protocol as that involved in the study. If these criteria are met, the claim would be acceptable as long as the surgeon’s own outcomes did not vary significantly from the reported results.

    “Painless” Claims

    Example 1: An ad states, “LASIK surgery is a safe and painless procedure.” A reasonable consumer could understand this statement to mean that the entire experience—preparation, surgery, and recovery—is painless. Patients undergoing refractive surgery typically experience some pain and discomfort for a short time following surgery. Patients are often given prescriptions to deal with pain or discomfort. In these circumstances, “painless” claims are almost certain to be considered false or deceptive. As with any other surgical procedure, new information and technology in refractive surgery can be expected to evolve over time. Accordingly, these guidelines are subject to periodic review and revision to ensure that they reflect the latest information and technology in refractive surgery.

    Note:

    The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act gives the FDA jurisdiction over the advertising of excimer lasers, because they were cleared as restricted devices. The FDA and FTC have generally agreed that the FTC has primary jurisdiction over those advertisements that discuss only the physician’s practice and not the excimer laser used in that practice.

    Approved by:  American Academy of Ophthalmology, September 2002
    American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, September 2002
    Refractive Surgery Clinical Committee, September 2002 

    Revised and Approved by: American Academy of Ophthalmology, October 2008
    American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, October 2008
    International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, October 2008

    This document was provided for you courtesy of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery to inform you of federal laws and policies and provide guidance on FDA and FTC laws and regulations governing advertising of surgical procedures.

    © 2008 American Academy of Ophthalmology®
    P.O. Box 7424 / San Francisco, CA 94109 / 415.561.8500

    American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
    4000 Legato Rd., Ste. 700 / Fairfax, VA 22033 / 703.591-2220

    International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology
    PO Box 7424 / San Francisco, CA 94109-7424

  • The Academy Store
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 13: Refractive Surgery
    Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs
    Cataract and Refractive Surgery Patient Education Video Collection
    LASIK Brochure
  • Dates & Deadlines
    JUL 13
    ASRS Annual Meeting New York, NY
    The 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS), from July 13-17, 2022, in New York, NY.
    View
    JUL 14
    Webinar: Employment Contracts – Practical Considerations for the Young Ophthalmologist
    As young ophthalmologists finish their formal training and head out to join the physician workforce, employment contracts can seem daunting to review, much less negotiate. Join us for this free, AAOE-sponsored webinar. You’ll get practical, real-world tips from a seasoned health care attorney and longtime practice administrator. A physician practice owner will moderate. The session will be interactive, so come with your questions. Presenters: Julia Lee, JD, Arvind Saini, MD, MBA, Bruce D. Armon
    View
    JUL 15
    Georgia Society of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting Amelia Island, FL
    2022 annual meeting of the Georgia state ophthalmology society, July 15-17, 2022, in Amelia Island, FL.
    View
    See all

    Save event

    Select your calendar system below.

    • Google Calendar
    •   Outlook or Apple Calendar
    • Yahoo Calendar

    Note: You will have to be signed in to your calendar and may have to enable pop-ups to add events.

  • Most Commented
    Loading, please wait...
    There are no comments available.
    Most Viewed
    Loading, please wait...
    Most Viewed content is not available.
 
  • Contact Us
  • About the Academy
  • Jobs at the Academy
  • Financial Relationships with Industry
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • For Advertisers
  • For Media
  • Ophthalmology Job Center

OUR SITES

  • EyeWiki
  • International Society of Refractive Surgery

FOLLOW THE ACADEMY

Medical Professionals

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Public & Patients

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Museum of the Eye

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Trip Advisor
  • Yelp
© American Academy of Ophthalmology 2022