• My Dashboard My Education Find an Ophthalmologist
  • Home
  • Coronavirus
  • For Ophthalmologists
    • Meetings
      • AAO 2022
        • Meeting Information
          • Past and Future Meetings
          • Mobile Meeting Guide
          • Contact Information
          • Annual Meeting News
          • Health and Safety
          • Policies and Disclaimers
        • Program
          • Program Highlights
          • Subspecialty Day
          • Virtual Meeting
          • Program Committees
          • CME
          • Meeting Archives
        • Expo
        • Registration
        • Hotels & Travel
          • Hotel Reservation Information
          • Chicago
          • International Attendees
          • Hotel Meeting Space
        • Presenter Central
          • Presenter Central
          • Abstract Selection Process
          • Submission Policies
          • Subject Classification/Topics
          • Instruction Courses and Skills Transfer Labs
          • Papers and Posters
          • Videos
          • Grand Rounds Symposium
          • Program Participant and Faculty Guidelines
          • Faculty Development Program
        • Exhibitors
          • Exhibitor Central
          • Exhibitor Portal Information
          • Exhibitor Prospectus
          • New Exhibiting Companies
          • Exhibitor Resources
          • International Exhibitors
          • Promotional Opportunities
          • Exhibitor Hotel Reservations
      • Mid-Year Forum
        • Registration and Travel
        • Congressional Advocacy Day
        • Advocacy Ambassador Program
        • Program
        • Schedule
        • Sponsored Attendees
        • News
      • Codequest
        • Codequest Instructors
        • Claim Codequest CME or CEU Credit
      • Eyecelerator
    • Clinical Education
      • COVID-19
      • Education
        • Browse All Education
        • Courses
        • Cases
        • Learning Plans
        • Interactive
        • Focal Points
        • Wills Eye Manual
        • Disease Reviews
        • Clinical Webinars
        • Diagnose This
        • Self-Assessments
        • Educational Centers
          • Glaucoma Education Center
          • Pediatric Ophthalmology Education Center
          • Laser Surgery Education Center
          • Myopia Resources
          • Oculofacial Plastic Surgery Center
          • Redmond Ethics Center
      • Journals
      • Guidelines
        • Browse All Practice Guidelines
        • Preferred Practice Patterns
        • Clinical Statements
        • Compendium Guidelines
        • Complementary Therapy Assessments
        • Medical Information Technology
        • Ophthalmic Technology Assessments
        • Patient Safety Statements
        • Choosing Wisely
        • Low Vision
        • Eye Care for Older Adults
        • Eye Disease Statistics
        • About the Hoskins Center
      • Video and Image Library
        • Browse All Videos
        • Clinical and Surgical Videos
        • Presentations and Lectures
        • 1-Minute Videos
        • Master Class Videos
        • Basic Skills Videos
        • Interviews
        • Images
        • Submit an Image
        • Submit a Video
      • Podcasts
        • Browse All Audio and Podcasts
        • Experts InSight
        • Ophthalmology Journal
      • News
        • Browse All Clinical News
        • Editors' Choice
        • Headlines
        • Current Insight
      • CME Central
        • Browse All CME Activities
        • Claim CME Credit and View Transcript
        • CME Planning Resources
        • Complete Your Financial Disclosure
        • Joint Sponsorship Portal
        • LEO Continuing Education Recognition Award
        • Safe ER/LA Opioid Prescribing
        • Check Your Industry Payment Records
      • MOC
      • Resident Education
        • Resident Education Home
        • Browse All Resident Content
          • Courses
          • Flashcards
          • Interactive Cases and Simulations
          • Videos
          • Webinars
        • OKAP and Board Exam Resources
          • OKAP Exam
          • Board Prep Resources
          • OKAP and Board Review Presentations
          • Study Flashcards
        • Cataract Master
        • Diversity and Inclusion Education
        • News and Advice from YO Info
        • Pediatric Ophthalmology Education Center
        • PGY-1 and PGY-2 Resources
        • Simulation in Resident Education
    • Membership
      • Join
      • Renew
      • Current Member
      • Volunteer
      • Physician Wellness
      • Member Directory
      • Member Obituaries
      • AAOE Membership
    • Advocacy
      • Advocacy News
      • Get Involved
        • Ways to Give
        • How to Get Involved
        • Congressional Advocacy
        • Support the Academy's Agenda
        • Research Legislation
        • Find Your Legislators
        • I Am an Advocate
        • Advocacy at Home
        • Advocate Tools
        • Best Practices for Advocating at Home
        • Social Media Toolkit
        • Letter to Editor
        • Town Hall Guide
        • Guide to Engaging With New Lawmakers
        • Resources
        • Attending a Political Fundraiser
      • OPHTHPAC
        • About Us
        • Join OPHTHPAC
        • OPHTHPAC Blog
      • Surgical Scope Fund
        • Support Surgery By Surgeons
        • Surgery By Surgeons Blog
    • Publications
      • EyeNet Magazine
        • Latest Issue
        • Archive
        • Subscribe
        • Advertise
        • Write For Us
        • Corporate Lunches
        • Contact
        • MIPS 2022
      • Focal Points
      • Ophthalmology
      • Ophthalmology Glaucoma
      • Ophthalmology Retina
      • YO Info
      • Scope
    • Subspecialties
      • Cataract/Anterior Segment
      • Comprehensive Ophthalmology
      • Cornea/External Disease
      • Glaucoma
      • Neuro-Ophthalmology/Orbit
      • Ocular Pathology/Oncology
      • Oculoplastics/Orbit
      • Pediatric Ophthalmology/Strabismus
      • Refractive Management/Intervention
      • Retina/Vitreous
      • Uveitis
    • IRIS Registry
      • About
      • Using the Registry
        • User Guide
        • Medicare Reporting
        • Maintenance of Certification
        • Non-EHR Reporting
      • Sign Up
        • Application Process
        • Why Participate
        • Once You've Applied: Getting Started
        • What Practices Are Saying About the Registry
      • Requirements
        • EHR Systems
        • Data & Technical Needs
      • Research
      • Registry Dashboard
      • News
      • Medicare & MIPS
    • Medicare Information
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
  • For Practice Management
    • Managing Your Practice
      • Managing Your Practice Topics
      • Coronavirus Resources
      • Reopening & Recovery
      • Practice Forms Library
      • Practice Management News and Advice
      • AAOE-Talk
      • Video Library
      • Ophthalmology Job Center
      • Benchmarking and Salary Tools
      • Academy Consultations
      • Consultant Directory
    • Coding
      • Coding Topics
      • Codequest Events
      • Ask the Coding Experts
      • Coding Updates and Resources
      • Coding for Injectable Drugs
      • EM Documentation
      • ICD-10-CM
      • Ophthalmic Coding Specialist (OCS) Exam
      • Retina
      • Savvy Coder
    • Webinars and Events
      • Annual Meeting
        • Master Classes
        • Coding Sessions
        • Submit an Instruction Course
      • Codequest Courses
      • Mid-Year Forum
      • Webinar Recordings
      • Upcoming Webinars
    • IRIS Registry
      • Merit-Based Incentive Payment
    • Medicare and MIPS
      • MIPS
        • Quality
        • Promoting Interoperability
        • Improvement Activities
        • Cost
        • Avoid a Penalty
      • Resources
      • Medicare Participation Options
      • Medicare Advantage Plans
      • New Medicare Card
      • Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (PECOS)
    • Regulatory Compliance
      • HIPPA Resources
      • Office of Inspector General
      • Audits
      • OSHA
    • AAOE Membership
      • Join AAOE
      • Membership Benefits
      • Renew/Pay Dues
    • About AAOE
      • AAOE Board of Directors
      • AAOE Content Committee
      • Volunteer Opportunities
  • For Public & Patients
    • Eye Health A-Z
    • Symptoms
    • Glasses & Contacts
    • Tips & Prevention
    • News
    • Ask an Ophthalmologist
    • Patient Stories
    • No Cost Eye Exams
    • Español
      • A - Z de Salud Ocular
      • Síntomas
      • Anteojos y Lentes de Contacto
      • Consejos y Prevención
      • Noticias
      • Relatos de Pacientes
      • Exámenes de la vista sin costo
      • English
  • AAO 2022
    • Meeting Information
      • Past and Future Meetings
      • Mobile Meeting Guide
      • Contact Information
      • Annual Meeting News
      • Health and Safety
      • Policies and Disclaimers
    • Program
      • Program Highlights
      • Subspecialty Day
      • Virtual Meeting
      • Program Committees
      • CME
      • Meeting Archives
    • Expo
    • Registration
    • Hotels & Travel
      • Hotel Reservation Information
      • Chicago
      • International Attendees
      • Hotel Meeting Space
    • Presenter Central
      • Presenter Central
      • Abstract Selection Process
      • Submission Policies
      • Subject Classification/Topics
      • Instruction Courses and Skills Transfer Labs
      • Papers and Posters
      • Videos
      • Grand Rounds Symposium
      • Program Participant and Faculty Guidelines
      • Faculty Development Program
    • Exhibitors
      • Exhibitor Central
      • Exhibitor Portal Information
      • Exhibitor Prospectus
      • New Exhibiting Companies
      • Exhibitor Resources
      • International Exhibitors
      • Promotional Opportunities
      • Exhibitor Hotel Reservations
  • About
    • Who We Are
      • What We Do
      • About Ophthalmology
      • The Eye Care Team
      • Ethics and the Academy
      • History
      • Museum of Vision
      • Values
    • Governance
      • Council
      • Board of Trustees
      • Committees
      • Academy Past Presidents
      • Secretariats
      • Elections
      • Academy Blog
      • Academy Staff Leadership
    • Leadership Development
    • Awards
      • Laureate Recognition Award
      • Outstanding Advocate Award
      • Outstanding Humanitarian Service Award
      • International Blindness Prevention Award
      • Distinguished Service Award
      • Guests of Honor
      • Secretariat Award
      • Straatsma Award
      • Achievement Award Program
      • Artemis Award
      • EnergEYES Award
      • International Education Award
      • International Scholar Award
      • Commitment to Advocacy Award
      • Visionary Society Award
    • Financial Relationships
    • Policy Statements
    • Related Organizations
      • Subspecialty/Specialized Interest Society Directory
      • State Society Directory
      • Subspecialty/Specialized Interest Society Meetings
      • State Society Meetings
      • Resources for Societies
    • Year in Review
      • 2020 Year in Review
  • Foundation
    • About
      • 2020-2021 Annual Report
      • Annual Report Archives
      • News From the Chair
      • Foundation Staff
    • Our Impact
      • Partners for Sight
      • Donor Spotlights
      • Global Ophthalmic Community
      • Sponsorships
      • Patients and the Public
    • Giving Options
      • Our Supporters
      • Estate and Planned Giving
      • Ophthalmic Business Council
      • Parke Center Campaign
      • Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Campaign
      • Museum of the Eye Campaign
    • Orbital Gala
      • Why Attend
      • Photo Recap
      • Corporate Support Opportunities
      • Tribute Gifts
      • Silent Auction
      • Corporate Sponsors
    • Donate
    • Museum of the Eye Campaign
      • Museum Supporters
  • Museum of the Eye
    • Visit
    • What's On
      • Museum Galleries
      • Special Exhibitions
      • Current Events
      • Past Events
    • Explore
      • Research and Resources
      • Collection Search
      • Previous Exhibits
      • Oral Histories
      • Biographies
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
    • Donate
    • About the Museum
      • Museum Blog
  • Young Ophthalmologists
    • YO Info
    • Learn to Bill
    • Engage with the Academy
  • Senior Ophthalmologists
    • Scope
    • Practice Transitions
  • International Ophthalmologists
    • Global Programs and Resources for National Societies
    • Awards
    • Global Outreach
  • Residents
  • Medical Students
×
Shop
Log In Create an Account
  • For Ophthalmologists
  • For Practice Management
  • For Public & Patients
  • Coronavirus
  • About
  • Foundation
  • Museum of the Eye
  • COVID-19
  • Journals
  • Education
    • Education
    • Courses
    • Cases
    • Learning Plans
    • Interactive
    • Focal Points
    • Wills Eye Manual
    • Disease Reviews
    • Clinical Webinars
    • Diagnose This
    • Self-Assessments
    • Education Centers
      • Glaucoma Education Center
      • Pediatric Ophthalmology Education Center
      • Laser Surgery Education Center
      • Oculofacial Plastic Surgery Center
      • Redmond Ethics Center
      • Myopia Resources
      • Thyroid Eye Disease Resources
  • Guidelines
    • Practice Guidelines
    • Preferred Practice Patterns
    • Clinical Statements
    • Ophthalmic Technology Assessments
    • Patient Safety Statements
    • Complementary Therapy Assessments
    • Compendium Guidelines
    • Medical Information Technology
    • Low Vision
    • Choosing Wisely
    • Eye Care for Older Adults
    • Eye Disease Statistics
    • About the Hoskins Center
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Premium IOLs
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction
  • Multimedia
    • Multimedia Library
    • Video
      • 1-Minute Videos
      • Presentations and Lectures
      • Master Class Videos
      • Basic Skills Videos
      • Clinical and Surgical Videos
      • Interviews
      • Resident Lectures
      • Submit a Video
      • YO Video Contest
    • Podcasts
      • Browse Podcast Archive
      • Experts InSight Podcast
      • Ophthalmology Journal Podcast
    • Images
      • Submit an Image
  • News
    • Clinical News
    • Editors' Choice
    • Headlines
    • Current Insight
  • CME
    • CME Central
    • Claim CME Credit and View Transcript
    • CME Planning Resources
    • Complete Your Financial Disclosure
    • Joint Sponsorship Portal
    • LEO Continuing Education Recognition Award
    • Safe ER/LA Opioid Prescribing
    • Check Your Industry Payment Records
  • MOC
  • Residents
    • Resident Education Home
    • Browse All Resident Content
      • Courses
      • Flashcards and Study Presentations
      • Interactive Cases and Simulations
      • Videos
      • Webinars
    • Cataract Master
    • Diversity and Inclusion Education
    • News and Advice from YO Info
    • OKAP and Board Exam Resources
      • OKAP Exam
      • Board Prep Resources
      • OKAP and Board Review Presentations
      • Study Flashcards
    • Pediatric Ophthalmology Education Center
    • PGY-1 and PGY-2 Resources
    • Resident Knowledge Exchange
    • Simulation in Resident Education
    • Clinical Education /
    • Book Excerpts /
    • Basic and Clinical Science Course - Excerpt
  • 2020–2021 BCSC Basic and Clinical Science Course™

    Go to Academy Store Learn more and Purchase.

    5 Neuro-Ophthalmology

    Chapter 13: The Patient With Nonorganic Ophthalmic Disorders

    Examination Techniques

    The clinician’s main goals for the examination of patients with suspected nonorganic ophthalmic disorders are:

    • exclude an organic cause by performing a thorough and complete history and examination

    • distinguish organic findings from nonorganic findings

    • meticulously test for positive clinical features that support the diagnosis

    The examination is based on symptoms that may manifest in the following categories:

    1. afferent visual pathway (visual acuity and visual field)

    2. ocular motility and alignment

    3. pupils and accommodation

    4. eyelid position and function

    Afferent Visual Pathway

    Selection of the appropriate tests of the afferent visual pathway will depend on whether the dysfunction appears to be visual acuity loss (complete or partial, bilateral or monocular) or a visual field defect.

    Bilateral no light perception

    Several tests, visual and nonvisual, are used when a patient reports complete bilateral blindness (ie, no light perception). A patient’s inability to perform nonvisual tasks may provide evidence of a nonorganic component to that patient’s report of total blindness. Proprioceptive testing, such as failure to sign a paper or adequately perform a finger-to-nose test, in the absence of systemic neurologic diseases, should alert the clinician to problems (conscious or unconscious) with patient cooperation.

    Finger-touching test

    In this test, the patient is asked to touch the fingertips of each hand together. A truly blind person can easily touch the fingertips together, because it requires proprioception, not vision (Fig 13-1). Therefore, a patient who claims to have no vision but cannot touch the fingertips of each hand together is responding in a nonphysiologic fashion.

    Pupillary reaction

    The presence of normal pupillary reactions suggests that the anterior visual pathways are intact. However, it does not prove the loss is nonorganic; there could be involvement of the bilateral anterior visual pathways or the pathways posterior to the branching of axons to the pretectal nuclei (eg, lateral geniculate nucleus, optic radiations, or occipital cortex). An aversive light reaction by a patient who claims blindness establishes at least some level of afferent input.

    Optokinetic nystagmus drum

    Perhaps the easiest test to perform is to slowly rotate an optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) drum in front of the patient. If the patient claims to see nothing but the patient’s eyes move with the drum, a nonorganic component has been established. It is possible for malingerers to purposely minimize or prevent the response by looking around or focusing past the drum.

    Figure 13-1 Finger-touching test. The patient is asked to touch the tips of the index finger of each hand together. A, A truly blind patient can easily perform this task. B, A patient with nonorganic visual loss may demonstrate the inability to touch the fingers together.

    (Courtesy of M. Tariq Bhatti, MD, and Mays A. El-Dairi, MD.)

    Mirror test

    In this test, a large mirror is slowly rotated side to side in front of the patient. As in the drum test, if the patient claims to see nothing but the examiner notes eye movement with the mirror, then a subjective–objective mismatch has been documented.

    Electrophysiologic testing

    Flash and pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) can play a role in assessing a possible nonorganic disorder. Although both false-positive and false-negative results are possible, the results can be used to confirm organic disease, for example a VEP with increased latency and decreased amplitude. Normal VEP results for a patient who reports severe monocular or binocular vision loss and who has normal clinical examination findings support a diagnosis of nonorganic disturbance of vision. An abnormal pattern-reversal visual evoked response in a patient who has normal findings on neuro-ophthalmic examination should not, by itself, lead to a diagnosis of an organic defect. A patient can use a variety of techniques (eg, inattention, lack of concentration, meditation, defocusing) to willfully suppress a visual evoked response (see the section “Visual evoked potential” in Chapter 3).

    Monocular no light perception

    All of the tests described for bilateral no light perception may be performed unilaterally. The clinician may also employ tests that involve ocular viewing confusion or tests that require binocularity.

    Relative afferent pupillary defect

    In patients who claim complete vision loss in 1 eye only, the absence of a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) substantially increases, but does not confirm, the likelihood of nonorganic visual loss when eye examination findings are normal (see Chapter 3).

    Base-out prism test

    For this test, the clinician places a 4–6 prism diopters (D) prism base-out in front of 1 eye while the patient keeps both eyes open; normally, this procedure elicits an inward shift of that eye (either as a conjugate saccade followed by a convergent movement of the opposite eye or by a convergent movement alone). Movement that occurs when the prism is placed over the eye with worse vision (“bad eye”) indicates vision in that eye.

    Vertical prism dissociation test

    A 4 Δ prism is placed base-down in front of the eye with better vision (“good eye”) of a patient who reports monocular vision loss. If the subject has symmetric vision in both eyes, 2 images should be seen, 1 above the other. If the subject is able to see the letters only with the “good” eye, then only 1 image should be seen (Fig 13-2).

    Golnik KC, Lee AG, Eggenberger ER. The monocular vertical prism dissociation test. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):135–137.

    Confusion tests

    For confusion tests to be successful, the patient must be unaware of which eye is actually being tested. Testing must appear to be simply a normal part of the examination. Any suspicion on the part of the patient will be detrimental to the test interpretation.

    Fogging Test

    In this test, the clinician employs a trial frame with plus and minus cylinder lenses (6 diopters [D]), which have their axes aligned; these are placed in front of the patient’s “good” eye. The patient is asked to read the Snellen chart while one of the cylinder lenses is rotated. The rotation will severely blur vision as the two axes are rotated out of alignment. If the patient continues to read, he or she is doing so with the “bad” eye (Fig 13-3).

    Duochrome Test

    The examiner places duochrome (Worth 4-dot) glasses over the patient’s eyes, with the red lens over the “bad” eye. The red-green filter is then placed over the Snellen chart, presenting the letters simultaneously either on a green or a red background. The green lens will prevent the good eye from seeing the red background letters. If the red letters are read, the patient is reading with the “nonseeing” eye (Fig 13-4).

    Polarized Lens Test

    The patient wears the polarized lenses that are used in the stereoacuity test while reading a chart specially projected with corresponding polarized filters. The clinician can ask the patient to read specific letters or lines to determine whether the patient is reading with the “bad” eye.

    Figure 13-2 Monocular vertical prism dissociation test. A, With nonorganic vision loss, the patient will describe seeing 2 images, 1 over the other. B, True organic vision loss will render the patient unable to see the second image or to see only a very blurred second image.

    (Courtesy of Lanning Kline, MD.)

    Figure 13-3 Fogging technique demonstrating the use of paired cylinders. A, A trial frame with +6D and –6D cylinder lenses are placed at parallel axes in front of the “good” eye. B, As the patient reads the Snellen chart, a small turn of the cylinder axis for 1 lens makes the axes no longer parallel and blurs the image seen by the “good” eye, so that the patient is now reading with the “bad” eye.

    (Illustration by Mark Miller.)

    Figure 13-4 Duochrome test. A, A patient with nonorganic visual loss wears red-green glasses (red over the left eye) and views a duochrome chart, unknowingly reading both sides of the chart. B, A patient with organic visual loss of the left eye is unable to read the left side of the chart.

    Stereopsis testing

    Stereopsis requires binocular vision. Patients may be tested for stereopsis with the standard stereoacuity test (using their appropriate near correction). Any evidence of stereopsis demonstrates that vision is present in the “bad” eye. It should be noted that patients with vision in only 1 eye may be able to detect asymmetries in the first several circles on the basis of monocular clues. However, if the circle is “standing out from the page,” the patient has binocularity.

    Monocular reduced vision

    Patients who report symptoms of reduced vision are more challenging. The clinician must convincingly demonstrate that the patient has better visual acuity than initially claimed. Many of the tests described for patients with binocular or monocular no light perception can also be used for patients with monocular (and binocular) reduced vision.

    Confusion tests

    The confusion tests described in the section “Monocular no light perception” are useful if the patient reports substantial reduction in visual acuity in 1 eye. The fogging test, duochrome test, and polarized lens test may help the clinician obtain a quantitative visual acuity measurement if the patient is cooperative enough to continue reading. Unlike the assessment of a patient who claims monocular blindness, in this case, simply demonstrating that the patient can read is not sufficient; the clinician must determine the actual visual acuity.

    Stereopsis testing

    As previously stated, the presence of stereopsis indicates that the patient has at least some vision in both eyes. Although attempts have been made to equate visual acuity and quantitative stereopsis, this relationship suggests, but does not establish, nonorganic vision loss (Table 13-2).

    Table 13-2 Comparison of Visual Acuity to Stereopsis

    Binocular reduced vision

    Binocular reduced vision is the most difficult symptom to address in patients with non-organic vision loss. Proving a nonorganic disorder requires time and patience from the examiner to induce the patient to admit to seeing better than initially claimed.

    Bottom-up acuity

    This examination begins with a visual acuity determination on the smallest line on the Snellen chart (20/10). If the patient cannot see these letters, the examiner announces the use of a “larger line” and then switches to the 20/15 line and several different 20/20 lines. The examiner continually expresses disbelief that such “large” letters cannot be identified. If the patient still denies being able to read the letters, he or she is asked to determine the number of characters present and whether the characters are round, square, and so on. The examiner might suggest that the characters are letters and that the first one is easier to identify than the others. By the time the “very large letters” (ie, 20/50) are reached, the patient often can read optotypes much smaller than initially identified.

    Alternately, small (⅛ D) plus and minus lenses or small cylinders are added and subtracted while the patient is asked how many letters are visible and what shape they are. It is sometimes possible to gradually improve the best-recorded visual acuity with this method.

    “Visual aids”

    The examiner can have the patient wear trial frames with 4 lenses equaling the correct prescription but suggest that they are special magnifying lenses that might enable improved vision. The potential acuity meter can also be presented as a means of “by-passing the visual block.” Improvement in either case suggests a nonorganic component.

    Use of alternative charts

    Patients may be persuaded to see substantially better by a switch in optotypes. For example, a patient who refuses to read type smaller than 20/200 using standard optotypes might read much better from a tumbling E chart or a chart with numbers.

    Specialty charts

    Specialty charts with the top line in 50 optotype instead of 400 optotype are available. Patients who say they can read only the “top line” immediately improve their resolution by 4 lines. Alternatively, the standard chart may be moved farther away.

    Visual field defect

    Although less common than visual acuity loss, patients do occasionally report difficulty seeing on 1 side. The problem may be binocular but is more commonly monocular with nonspecific constrictions.

    Automated perimetry testing

    In general, this type of testing is not helpful in distinguishing organic from nonorganic visual field loss. The machines are quite easy to fool; if motivated, an observer can reproduce homonymous defects, altitudinal defects, or even arcuate and central scotomata. Nonetheless, central scotomata are extremely rare in nonorganic vision loss and warrant further evaluation. There are no characteristic changes in automated perimetry testing results that would confirm the suspicion of a nonorganic deficit. However, one unusual situation in which automated perimetry testing might be useful would be for a patient with a monocular defect that appears to respect the vertical midline. If repeating the field testing with both eyes open produces a similar, or even incomplete or “missing-half,” defect, then a nonorganic component is present (Fig 13-5).

    Frisen L. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(8):805–809.

    Sitko KR, Peragallo JH, Bidot S, Biousse V, Newman NJ, Bruce BB. Pitfalls in the use of stereoacuity in the diagnosis of nonorganic visual loss. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):198–202.

    Confrontation testing

    This test is useful in the case of a dense visual field defect. The area where the patient “can’t see” is carefully identified. Later, the patient is tested for “motility.” As part of this examination, stimuli are placed in various areas of the patient’s peripheral field, including those areas where the patient “couldn’t see.” Accurate saccades to these nonauditory targets indicate an intact visual field.

    Figure 13-5 “Missing-half” field defect. A 33-year-old man complained of decreased vision temporally in the right eye after being in a motor vehicle accident. Automated perimetry testing demonstrates a normal field in the left eye (A) and a temporal defect in the right eye (B). Visual field testing performed with both eyes open (C) demonstrates persistence of the visual field defect, indicating a nonorganic basis for the visual complaint.

    (Courtesy of Karl C. Golnik, MD.)

    In some cases, confrontation testing (“silent visual fields”) might initially appear to confirm a dense visual field defect. The patient is subsequently asked to count fingers in the “nonseeing” field and is instructed to report “none” when no fingers are seen. As the test progresses, the examiner begins showing fingers without saying anything. A response of “none” each time the fingers are put up confirms vision in that area.

    Kinetic perimetry testing

    In manual kinetic perimetry (Goldmann) testing, the visual field is tested continuously in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction starting with the I4e stimulus. A common nonorganic response shows a spiraling isopter getting closer and closer to fixation as testing continues. As larger stimuli (III4e and V4e) are employed, there is often further constriction, resulting in overlapping isopters (Fig 13-6). The latter can also be detected with automated kinetic perimetry. It is important to make sure there is no step across the vertical or nasal horizontal midline; a step across the midline may indicate that at least some physiologic component is present in the field abnormality.

    Tangent screen testing

    In tangent screen testing, the patient is tested with a 9-mm white stimulus at 1 m. The areas of patient response are marked and the patient is moved back to 2 m. The test is then repeated using an 18-mm white stimulus. The field should expand to twice the original size. Failure to expand (tubular or gun-barrel field) is nonphysiologic and indicates a nonorganic component to the field constriction (Fig 13-7).

    Figure 13-6 A 59-year-old woman complained of 1 year of headaches. A, B, Automated static perimetry using a V-sized test object demonstrated severe constriction. C, D, Subsequent kinetic perimetry visual field testing revealed crossing and spiraling isopters, indicating non-physiologic constriction of the visual fields.

    (Courtesy of Steven A. Newman, MD.)

    Figure 13-7 The tangent visual field test at 1 and 2 meters (m). The visual field normally expands on increasing the testing distance from 1 to 2 m. This is due to the increase in the visual angle from X° to 2X°. In a patient with nonorganic vision loss, the normal expansion of the visual field is absent and remains contracted despite the increase in testing distance.

    (Based on an illustration by Swaraj Bose, MD.)

    Excerpted from BCSC 2020-2021 series: Section 5 - Neuro-Ophthalmology. For more information and to purchase the entire series, please visit https://www.aao.org/bcsc.

  • Most Commented
    Loading, please wait...
    There are no comments available.
    Most Viewed
    Loading, please wait...
    Most Viewed content is not available.
  • The Academy Store
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Complete Print Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Complete eBook Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Complete Print and eBook Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Residency Print Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Residency eBook Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course Complete Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course Residency Set
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 01: Update on General Medicine
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 02: Fundamentals and Principles of Ophthalmology
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 03: Clinical Optics and Vision Rehabilitation
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 04: Ophthalmic Pathology and Intraocular Tumors
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 05: Neuro-Ophthalmology
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 06: Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 07: Oculofacial Plastic and Orbital Surgery
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 08: External Disease and Cornea
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 09: Uveitis and Ocular Inflammation
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 10: Glaucoma
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 11: Lens and Cataract
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 12: Retina and Vitreous
    2022-2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course, Section 13: Refractive Surgery
    2022 IRIS Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Preparation Kit
    Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs
    Retina Patient Education Video Collection
    Cataract and Refractive Surgery Patient Education Video Collection
    Glaucoma Patient Education Video Collection
    Oculoplastics Patient Education Video Collection
    Pediatrics Patient Education Video Collection
    2022 Coding Coach: Complete Ophthalmic Coding Reference 
    2022 CPT: Complete Pocket Ophthalmic Reference
    2022 Retina Coding: Complete Reference Guide
 
  • Contact Us
  • About the Academy
  • Jobs at the Academy
  • Financial Relationships with Industry
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • For Advertisers
  • For Media
  • Ophthalmology Job Center

OUR SITES

  • EyeWiki
  • International Society of Refractive Surgery

FOLLOW THE ACADEMY

Medical Professionals

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Public & Patients

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Museum of the Eye

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Trip Advisor
  • Yelp
© American Academy of Ophthalmology 2022