Due to poor air quality related to fires in California, the Academy’s San Francisco offices will be closed Friday, Nov. 16. Member support staff will not be available by phone and responses to emails may be delayed.

  • Written By:
    Retina/Vitreous

    This is the first study to evaluate long-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic epiretinal membrane (ERM), with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.

    Study design

    This single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series included 78 patients with symptomatic ERM. Sixty-one patients had pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with ILM peeling, and 17 underwent PPV alone. Patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years.

    Outcomes

    At postoperative year 5, both groups had significant vision gains as well as comparable visual acuity and macular thickness.

    The study did find a lower recurrence of ERMs requiring surgery in the ILM group at postoperative year 1, but the difference was not significant at postoperative year 5 (1.6% for the ILM group vs. 11.8% for the PPV-only group; P=0.118).

    Limitations

    These findings should be interpreted with caution, per the authors, who indicated that ILM peel may result in a more complete removal of the ERM. In addition, there was a significant disparity in group size.

    Clinical significance

    This is the first study with a 5-year follow-up focusing on the effects of ILM peeling during PPV. At this juncture, real-world changes in surgical technique are unlikely to occur until further data can support moving away from ILM peeling. For now, I will likely continue to peel the ILM until convinced otherwise.