Low-Dose Bevacizumab for ROP: Update on Outcomes
By Lynda Seminara
Selected By: Stephen D. McLeod, MD
Journal Highlights
Ophthalmology, December 2018
Download PDF
Although intravitreal bevacizumab continues to gain popularity for treatment of severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), concerns remain regarding long-term sequelae. In an earlier publication, Wallace et al. reported short-term outcomes for 61 infants in a dose de-escalation study. The authors have updated their study. Although they observed good structural outcomes after low-dose bevacizumab treatment, many eyes needed further treatment.
This masked multicenter study included 61 infants with type 1 ROP in at least 1 eye. If the ROP was bilateral at enrollment, the study eye was chosen randomly. Study eyes received intravitreal injections of bevacizumab at de-escalating doses (0.25 mg, 0.125 mg, 0.063 mg, or 0.031 mg). If necessary, fellow eyes received 1 dose level higher (0.625 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.125 mg, or 0.063 mg, respectively). After 4 weeks, the decision to use additional treatment was made at the investigator’s discretion. Main outcomes were early ROP recurrence, late ROP recurrence, additional treatment, and structural findings.
Of the 61 eyes, 25 (41%) had additional treatment: 3 for early failure (within 4 weeks), 11 for late recurrence of ROP (after 4 weeks), and 11 for persistent avascular retina. Retreatment for late recurrence or early failure occurred in 2 of the 11 eyes receiving 0.25 mg (18%), 4 of the 16 eyes receiving 0.125 mg (25%), 8 of the 24 eyes given 0.063 mg (33%), and none of the 10 eyes given 0.031 mg. By the 6-month corrected age, 56 of the 61 study eyes (92%) exhibited ROP regression and normal posterior poles. One eye developed stage 5 retinal detachment, and 4 patients died of preexisting conditions.
In this study, bevacizumab doses as low as 0.031 mg resulted in favorable outcomes. It has been estimated that the standard 0.625-mg dose for ROP may be 10,000 times that needed to neutralize intraocular vascular endothelial growth factor. Hence, it may be prudent to reduce the dosage as much as possible. (Also see related commentary by Andreas Stahl, MD, in the same issue.)
The original article can be found here.