Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Graduates Match Successfully
Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring program students have matched to 15 different programs across the country, including the W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, Duke University Eye Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, and Howard Ophthalmology.
“The Minority Ophthalmology program was crucial to my ultimate success in the match,” said Aaron C. Brown, MD, who was part of the Class of 2018. “I feel that those few short days at the Student Engagement Program started a snowball effect that continually enriched my academic life.” Dr. Brown matched at New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai.
The program is a partnership between the Academy and the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO). The goal is to increase diversity in ophthalmology by helping underrepresented in medicine (URIM) students become competitive ophthalmology residency applicants. Students receive mentorship, networking opportunities, and access to educational resources.
Learn more at aao.org/minority-mentoring.
Academy Publications and Website Earn High Scores
Results are in from the Kantar Media 2021 Eyecare Readership Study, the industry standard for independent, third-party readership data.
Print publications. Ophthalmology journal and EyeNet ranked first and second, respectively, for total readers (percent of ophthalmologists who report reading the publication) and average issue readers (percent of ophthalmologists who read any given issue).
EyeNet was top ranked for average page exposures (percent of ophthalmologists likely to see a page in an average issue of the publication). And among comprehensive ophthalmic trade publications, EyeNet has the highest percent of ophthalmologists who report reading the magazine both frequently and thoroughly.
AAO.org. Kantar Media also found that of 76 ophthalmic sites and publications, U.S. ophthalmologists are most likely to visit AAO.org first when looking for 1) quality clinical content to use in practice, 2) information on drugs, devices, and professional services, and 3) timely and relevant professional news.
EyeWiki Contest: Read the Eight Winning Articles
EyeWiki is the Academy’s collaborative online encyclopedia where physicians, patients, and the public can view content written by ophthalmologists covering the spectrum of eye disease, diagnosis, and treatment. Each year EyeWiki hosts two writing contests. One is for U.S. residents and fellows, and the other is for ophthalmologists outside the United States.
In July, winners of the 2021 International Ophthalmologists contest were announced.
- Sahil Agrawal, MBBS, MD, FICO, New Delhi: Imaging in Orbit and Oculoplasty
- Hélène Bailleul, MD, Caen, France: Cataract Surgery With Bag-In-the-Lens (BIL) Fixation Technique
- Marianna Kavalaraki MD, MSc, Athens, Greece: Cherry-Red Spot
- Ana I.M. Miguel, MD, FEBO, PhD, Avranches, France: OCT-Angiography and Glaucoma
These authors won free access to selected Academy online products.
Earlier this year, winners of the 2020 U.S. Residents and Fellows contest were announced.
- Robin K. Kuriakose, MD, Loma Linda University Eye Institute: Incision Construction
- Jacquelyn Laplant, MD, Jude Children’s Research Hospital: Carotid Cavernous Fistula
- Minh T. Nguyen, MD, University of Washington: Coronavirus (COVID-19)
- Karen M. Wai, MD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear: Medial Canthal Tendon Avulsion
These authors were invited to participate in the Academy’s Advocacy Ambassador program in conjunction with Mid-Year Forum 2021.
Next contest deadlines. For a chance to win a trip to the Mid-Year Forum, U.S. residents and fellows must submit an article by Dec. 1, 2021. International ophthalmologists must submit an article by June 1, 2022, for a chance to win online Academy products.
To read the winning articles and submit to either contest, visit aao.org/eyewiki.
FOR THE RECORD
Life Achievement Honor Award Recipients
Individuals who have cumulatively earned 60 points and have made significant contributions to ophthalmology, as determined by the Academy’s Awards Committee, were nominated to receive the Life Achievement Honor Award. This year’s recipients are as follows:
Michael W. Brennan, MD
Pravin U. Dugel, MD
Robert S. Feder, MD
Judy E. Kim, MD
Scott R. Lambert, MD
James C. Tsai, MD, MBA
Senior Achievement Award
Individuals who have cumulatively earned 30 points were nominated to receive this award.
Anita Agarwal, MD
Mark A. Alford, MD
Steve A. Arshinoff, MD
Brandon Ayres, MD
Erick D. Bothun, MD
Scott E. Brodie, MD, PhD
Paul J. Bryar, MD
Meena Chakrabarti, MS, MBBS
Philip P. Chen, MD
Kelvin Kam Lung Chong, MD
Kathleen M. Duerksen, MD
Steven P. Dunn, MD
Justis P. Ehlers, MD
William H. Ehlers, MD
Marjan Farid, MD
Douglas R. Fredrick, MD
Scott M. Friedman, MD
Victor H. Gonzalez, MD
Natasha L. Herz, MD
Soosan Jacob, MBBS, FRCS
Arif O. Khan, MD
Hamza N. Khan, MD, FACS
Richard A. Lehrer, MD
Sayoko E. Moroi, MD, PhD
Rahul T. Pandit, MD
Howard D. Pomeranz, MD, PhD
Joseph P. Shovlin, MD
Rishi P. Singh, MD
Sharon D. Solomon, MD
Sarkis H. Soukiasian, MD
Edward J. Wladis, MD
Elizabeth Yeu, MD
Individuals who have cumulatively earned 10 points were nominated to receive this award.
Vinay K. Aakalu, MD, MPH
Prema Abraham, MD
William R. Barlow, MD
Anne Barmettler, MD
Vineet N. Batra, MD
Erica Bernfeld, MD
Elena Bitrian, MD
Cesar A. Briceno, MD
Nicholas J. Butler, MD
Michelle T. Cabrera, MD
John P. Campbell, MD, MPH
Allen Chiang, MD
Deborah M. Costakos, MD
Yassine J. Daoud, MD
Dan DeAngelis, MD
Dilsher S. Dhoot, MD
Heather Hambrick Dunn, COA, OCS
Matthew E. Emanuel, MD
Eric L. Fry, MD
Sapna Gangaputra, MD, MPH
Patrick Gooi, MD
James A. Gow, MD
Michael D. Greenwood, MD
Paul Hahn, MD, PhD
Elizabeth M. Hofmeister, MD
Peter Hovland, MD, PhD
Alex Ansun Huang, MD
Grant A. Justin, MD
S. Anna Kao, MD
Reshma Katira, MD
Carolyn Kloek, MD
Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer, MD
Helen L. Kornmann, MD
Stacey J. Kruger, MD
Susan M. Ksiazek, MD
Ajay E. Kuriyan, MD
Linda A. Lam, MD, MBA
Scott A. Larson, MD
Junhee Lee, MD
Erin B. Lessner, MD
Ashleigh Laurin Levison, MD
Xihui Lin, MD
Amanda C. Maltry, MD
Mina Massaro-Giordano, MD
Mark L. Mazow, MD
John T. McAllister, MD
Mark R. Melson, MD
Kamiar Mireskandari, MBCHB, PhD
Masahiro Miura, MD
Bobeck S. Modjtahedi, MD
Heather Moss, MD, PhD
Venkatesh Prajna Namperumalsamy, MBBS
Armando L. Oliver, MD
Alpa S. Patel, MD
Kathryn L. Pepple, MD, PhD
Renelle Pointdujour Lim, MD
Christina R. Prescott, MD
Naveen K. Rao, MD
Prethy Rao, MD
Ann M. Renucci, MD
William W. Richardson II, MD
Benjamin W. Roberts, MD
Michael R. Robinson, MD
Guillermo Rocha, MD
Brian C. Samuels MD, PhD
Louis Savar, MD
Ankoor S. Shah MD, PhD
Jessica G. Shantha, MD
Lucy Q. Shen, MD
Evan Silverstein, MD
Lee A. Snyder, MD
Jeffrey R. SooHoo, MD
Chie Sotozono, MD
Christopher E. Starr, MD
Sadiqa K. Stelzner, MD, FACS
Benjamin J. Thomas, MD
Lisa S. Thompson, MD
Andrea A. Tooley, MD
Paul D. Weishaar, MD
Adam S. Wenick, MD
Bryan J. Winn, MD
Se Joon Woo, MD
Fasika A. Woreta, MD
Wei-Chi Wu, MD
Vivian T. Yin, MD, MPH
Michael K. Yoon, MD
Joshua A. Young, MD
Nominees for approval by the Board of Trustees to receive the Academy’s Annual Secretariat Award in 2021
Each Secretary, with approval from their Senior Secretary, may nominate a maximum of five individuals to receive the Secretariat Award. The following nominations were submitted for the 2021 Annual Secretariat Award:
Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, senior secretary for Clinical Education, Rahul Khurana, MD, secretary for Online Education, J. Timothy Stout, MD, PhD, MBA, secretary for Lifelong Learning and Assessment, and Ruth D. Williams, MD, Chief Medical Editor, EyeNet, nominate:
Michael F. Chiang, MD
James Chodosh, MD, MPH
Monte A. Del Monte, MD
Swetha Dhanireddy, MD
Laura B. Enyedi, MD
Sharon Fekrat, MD
Jeffrey D. Henderer, MD
Gary N. Holland, MD
Catherine J. Hwang, MD
Frank Joseph Martin, MD
Robert F. Melendez, MD, MBA
Rukhsana G. Mirza, MD
Ingrid U. Scott, MD, MPH
Prem S. Subramanian, MD, PhD
Linda M. Tsai, MD
Steven Yeh, MD
Quality of Care
Timothy W. Olsen, MD, secretary for Quality of Care, nominates:
Vinay K. Aakalu, MD, MPH
Gil Binenbaum, MD
Justis P. Ehlers, MD
Steven J. Gedde, MD
Hana L. Takusagawa, MD
George A. Williams, MD, senior secretary for Advocacy, John D. Peters, MD, secretary for State Affairs, David B. Glasser, MD, secretary for Federal Affairs, and Michael X. Repka, MD, Medical Director for Governmental Affairs, nominate:
Justin D. Bloomberg, MD
Wiley Andrew Chambers, MD
Jeremy D. Clark, MD
Malvina B. Eydelman, MD
John M. Haley, MD, OCS
David D. Ingvoldstad, MD, MBA
Craig Kliger, MD
Jeff S. Maltzman, MD
Lisa Nijm, MD, JD
Rebecca J. Taylor, MD
Ravi D. Goel, MD, senior secretary for Ophthalmic Practice, nominates:
David B. Glasser, MD
Stephanie Collins Mangham, COA, MBA, OCSR
Michael X. Repka, MD, MBA
Maria M. Aaron, MD, secretary for Annual Meeting, nominates:
Jack A. Cohen, MD, FACS
Julia A. Haller, MD
Kuldev Singh, MD, MPH
Sarah Wellik, MD
Dianna L. Seldomridge, MD, MBA, secretary for Communications, nominates:
Sidney K. Gicheru, MD
Ravi D. Goel, MD
Stephen N. Lipsky, MD
Thomas L. Steinemann, MD
Andrea A. Tooley, MD
Aaron M. Miller, MD, secretary for Member Services, nominates:
Marcus Ang, MBBS, PhD
Cesar A. Briceno, MD
Sanjay D. Goel, MD
Michelle W. Latting, MD
LDP Class of 2019
R.V. Paul Chan, MD, secretary for Global Alliances, nominates:
Ashvin Agarwal, MD
Soosan Jacob, MBBS, FRCS
Jacquelyn A. O’Banion, MD
Grace Sun, MD
Hiroko Terasaki, MD
Stephen D. McLeod, MD, Ophthalmology Editor, nominates:
Thuy A. Doan, MD, PhD
Cecilia S. Lee, MD
Philip J. Rosenfeld, MD, PhD
Brian L. VanderBeek, MD, MPH
Maria A. Woodward, MD, MS
Henry D. Jampel, MD, MHS, Ophthalmology Glaucoma Editor-In-Chief, nominates:
JoAnn A. Giaconi, MD
Mingguang He, MD, PhD
Louis R. Pasquale, MD
Aakriti Garg Shukla, MD
Brian C. Stagg, MD
Andrew P. Schachat, MD, Ophthalmology Retina Editor-in-Chief, nominates:
Christine Curcio, PhD
Laura Downie, BOptom
Michael J. Elman, MD
Nicolas Feltgen, MD
Carl D. Regillo, MD, FACS
Submit Your Big Data & AI Studies to Ophthalmology Science
To learn more about the special issue or to submit, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Urgent MIPS Notice—Get Started on Your 90-Day Performance Periods
Under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), you will be evaluated on up to four performance categories. Two of these—promoting interoperability and improvement activities—each have a performance period that must be at least 90 consecutive days and must be completed no later than Dec. 31, 2021. (For the other two performance categories—quality and cost—the performance period is the full calendar year.)
How to start. Visit aao.org/medicare for detailed descriptions of the promoting interoperability measures and the improvement activities that are most relevant to ophthalmology.
Don’t delay. It’s advisable to avoid waiting until the last moment (Oct. 3) to start performing improvement activities and promoting interoperability measures. An earlier start will provide you with leeway if you run into difficulty with your MIPS procedures.
After completing your performance period, you will be able to use the IRIS Registry web portal to manually attest to your performance starting in January.
Get updated Academy resources. Download the 2021 IRIS Registry Preparation Kit (aao.org/iris-registry) and EyeNet’s MIPS manual (aao.org/eyenet/mips-manual-2021). These have both been updated to reflect CMS changes to quality benchmarks (see “MIPS 2021—Don’t Overlook Corrections to the Quality Measure Benchmarks”).
What about COVID-19? For the latest information on the “extreme and uncontrollable” circumstances exception, you can visit aao.org/medicare/resources/MIPS-extreme-hardship-exceptions.
Volunteer Ophthalmologists Needed for EyeCare America
Did you know that you can give back to your community by doing the work you already do right in your office? EyeCare America makes it possible by matching volunteer ophthalmologists with eligible patients. It involves minimal time commitment but is very impactful.
“I’m on a limited income and Social Security,” said James “Pete” Hastert, an EyeCare America patient. “It was a true blessing to receive this service, and you all made it possible.”
Volunteers are matched with eligible patients through two programs.
- The Seniors Program volunteers provide a comprehensive medical eye exam to eligible seniors (age 65 or older) and care for up to one year for any condition diagnosed during the initial exam at no out-of-pocket cost for the ophthalmologist’s services.
- Glaucoma Program volunteers are asked to provide a one-time glaucoma eye exam at no cost to eligible patients.
Volunteers for either program see an average of two to four patients a year.
Learn more at aao.org/eyecare-america. (This is just one of numerous Academy volunteer opportunities, which you can find at aao.org/volunteering.)
OMIC Tip: When a Patient Refuses Care, Document It
What happens when a patient refuses to follow through on your medical recommendation? Often, the repercussions are minor. However, when the patient has a vision- or life-threatening condition, the consequences can be serious. Below are examples in which patients of OMIC-insured physicians refused care, came to harm, and sued their ophthalmologist:
- A patient called to report symptoms suggestive of endophthalmitis but refused to drive to a satellite office where the ophthalmologist was working that day.
- A patient who had recently had cataract surgery called the surgeon to complain of headaches unrelated to the surgery but would not agree to see her primary care physician.
- The parents of a child with retinoblastoma would not agree to surgery.
When a patient refuses to follow your recommendations, take the steps below to protect your patients and yourself:
Clarify and document why care is refused. Determine the reason for the patient’s refusal. Ophthalmologists and staff are often frustrated when patients refuse recommendations, and they may make assumptions about the reasons. A simple approach can be very effective: “You’re not willing to have the surgery? That is certainly your choice, but I would like to understand your decision. Can you tell me more about it?”
Educate the patient and obtain informed refusal. Although courts have recognized the patient’s right to refuse treatment, they have consistently ruled that the decision must be an informed one.
Monitor ongoing and repeated noncompliance. OMIC claims data show that ophthalmologists do not always adequately warn patients of how noncompliance puts them at risk.
Duty to report neglect. Physicians have a duty to report suspected child abuse or neglect. This may be necessary if a parent refuses important care for his or her child.
Learn more in the 2013 OMIC Digest article, “High Cost of Refused Care,” at omic.com/omic-digest-archives-2013.
Find informed refusal consent forms at omic.com/informed-refusal-of-care-consent-form.
OMIC offers professional liability insurance exclusively to Academy members, their employees, and their practices.
Webinar: Attend the Sept. 23 Academy/AAPOS Journal Club
Join moderator Donny W. Suh, MD, for the next Academy/American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) journal club focusing on important pediatric studies recently published in the peer-reviewed literature.
Topics will include the reliability of telemedicine for real-time pediatric ophthalmology consultations, and the Wright hang-back recession with fibrin glue compared with standard fixed suture recession for the treatment of horizontal strabismus.
Dr. Suh will discuss these papers with Kenneth W. Wright, MD; Sudha Nallasamy, MD; and David G. Hunter, MD, on Sept. 23 from 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. EST.
Register today at aao.org/clinical-webinars.
Wellness: Get Your Exercise Routine Back on Track
It can be easy to let a hectic schedule derail your exercise routine, and once you’re out of the habit it’s tough to get back on track. For help with initiating and maintaining an exercise regimen that fits into your daily schedule, visit this month’s Academy wellness pages for tips and links.
For wellness information and resources, visit aao.org/wellness.
Meet Your Practice’s Payer Requirements in the Exam Lane
Ultimate Documentation Compliance Training for Scribes and Technicians is a comprehensive on-demand course that will significantly improve your team’s ability to document patient encounters correctly, satisfy payer requirements, and effectively shield your practice from audits and recoupments.
Learn more and sign up at aao.org/techtraining.
AAOE Webinar: Learn About the 2021 HIPAA Privacy Rule Changes
Do you want to learn more about the proposed changes to HIPAA’s Privacy Rule? Don’t miss this AAOE-sponsored town-hall style webinar on Sept. 28 at 2:00 p.m. EST. This live event, which is free to AAOE members, will be hosted by Eagles Associates President Jennifer Cosey and Academy Coding and Practice Management Executive Joy Woodke. They will explain the proposed changes, which include improved information sharing for care coordination and enhanced flexibilities for disclosures in emergency or threatening circumstances. Questions about the updates and their implementation will be presented to the panel for open discussion.
Learn more at aao.org/meetings and scroll down to select “Webinars.”
Academy-Supported Bill Targets Prior Authorization Burdens
Prior authorization is delaying and disrupting the sight-saving care that ophthalmologists provide to patients. The requirements also can place unnecessary administrative burdens on practices. Reducing these prior authorization obstacles is a top Academy priority.
Prior authorization interferes with patient care. Aetna, for example, rolled out a policy on July 1 requiring preapproval for all cataract surgeries across all lines of business and sites of service—despite opposition from the Academy and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS). That day, an Academy member said the policy already had delayed treatment for a patient who needed emergency cataract surgery due to a macula issue.
The Academy uses multiple avenues to oppose prior authorization. Along with ASCRS, the Academy has taken strong actions to get the policy rescinded: meeting with Aetna, communicating with the new administrator of CMS, launching full-scale grassroots and public relations efforts, and pursuing legislative solutions. The Aetna policy, which was still in place at time of press, is an example of the harm caused by lack of oversight and poor transparency into payers’ use of prior authorization.
The 117th Congress reintroduces legislation. The Academy-led Regulatory Relief Coalition is making a strong push for reform by working with its congressional allies to reintroduce and advance prior authorization legislation in this Congress. Thanks to the coalition’s efforts, the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act (HR 3173) was introduced in May by Reps. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash.; Ami Bera, MD, D-Calif.; Mike Kelly, R-Pa.; and Larry Bucshon, MD, R-Ind.
By July, HR 3173 had over 150 sponsors in the U.S. House of Representatives and had been endorsed by more than 275 physician, patient, and other stakeholder organizations. With increasing bipartisan support, the coalition remains optimistic that the bill could become law during this Congress.
During a news conference in May with the House bill sponsors, George A. Williams, MD, Academy senior secretary for advocacy, said the prior authorization reform legislation would “provide greater transparency, oversight, and standardization on how Medicare Advantage plans are using prior authorization.”
How you can help. Academy members can back these efforts by urging their federal representatives to support HR 3173 at aao.org/advocacy/action/vv.