Skip to main content
  • Ophthalmic Pearls

    Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid With Ocular Involvement: A Primer

    By Alexi Geevarghese, MD, MS, and Eleanore Kim, MD
    Edited by Bennie H. Jeng, MD

    Download PDF

    Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) with ocular involve­ment, also known as ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, is a chronic autoimmune cicatrizing conjunctivitis. MMP can have serious, vision-threat­ening complications as well as systemic manifestations in the mouth, orophar­ynx, esophagus, skin, and genitoper­ineal region. Thus, it is important to diagnose MMP early in its clinical course, to treat it in a timely manner, and to prevent its adverse sequelae.

    Prevalence and Epidemiology

    MMP with ocular involvement is a rare disease, with one study in the United Kingdom reporting an incidence of 0.8 per 1 million.1 Patients are typically over 60 years old at the time of diagnosis. Women are more commonly affected than men, at an estimated ratio of 2:1. There is no known racial or geographic predilection. MMP is associated with other autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, polyarteritis nodosa, and HLA-B27 spondyloarthropathies.

    Pathophysiology

    Although the pathophysiology of MMP with ocular involvement is not fully known, its pathogenesis can generally be broken down into three phases. In the injury phase, circulating autoantibodies to antigens in conjunctival basement membrane (e.g., beta-4-subunit of alpha-6 beta-4 integrin of hemides­mosomes in lamina lucida) in suscep­tible individuals activate a complement cascade. This leads to the acute inflam­mation and proliferation phase, which involves proinflammatory cytokine release and immune cell recruitment and activation. Finally, in the fibrosis phase, there is fibroblast activation, remodeling of the extracellular matrix, and, ultimately, fibrosis.2

    Clinical Features

    While oral involvement is the most common manifestation of MMP, ocular involvement is also frequent and portends a poorer prognosis.3 Ocular involvement tends to be bilateral, asym­metric, and chronically progressive.

    Early signs and symptoms of MMP with ocular involvement are nonspe­cific, which often delays diagnosis (Table 1). In the intermediate stages of MMP with ocular involvement, there is evidence of subconjunctival fibrosis and shortening of the inferior fornix (Fig. 1A); the latter is characteristic of cicatrizing conjunctival diseases. The pathognomonic signs of MMP with ocular involvement present later in the course of disease. The most pertinent of these is symblepharon, an adhesion between the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva (Fig. 1B). Other late signs include flattening of the plica and keratinization of the caruncle. Corneal opacification and fusion of the upper and lower eyelids, known as ankyloblepharon, are signs of further progres­sion.

    Recurrent cycles of inflammation and fibrosis can lead to destruction of goblet cells and lacrimal gland obstruc­tion, ultimately causing ocular surface disease, including fibrosis and tear film deficiency. Serious sight-threatening complications may ensue, including epithelial breakdown, corneal ulcer­ation, microbial keratitis, corneal melt, and perforation. Other complications include trichiasis, entropion, lagoph­thalmos, and glaucoma.

    Staging. The clinical progression of MMP with ocular involvement is typi­cally characterized through two staging systems: the Foster system, which is based on increasing severity of clinical signs; and the Mondino and Brown system, based on loss of inferior fornix depth (Table 2). However, neither sys­tem has been proven to correlate with disease progression or to predict the need for immunosuppression.4

    Patient With MMP
    PATIENT WITH MMP. Photos of patient’s left eye highlight (1A) inferior fornix shortening and (1B) superior eyelid symblepharon. Other notable features are erythematous and edematous eyelids, entropion, conjunctivitis, superior forniceal shortening, symblephara, corneal opacities, and corneal vascularization.

    Diagnosis

    The differential diagnosis for cicatriz­ing conjunctivitis includes the follow­ing conditions:

    • infections (e.g., adenovirus, Chla­mydia trachomatis, Corynebacterium diphtheriae)
    • allergic eye disease (e.g., atopic kera­toconjunctivitis)
    • drug-induced disorders (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis)
    • autoimmune disorders (e.g., lichen planus, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis scleroderma, linear IgA dermatosis, MMP with ocular involve­ment)
    • chemical, thermal, or radiation injury
    • medicamentosa
    • pseudopemphigoid
    • neoplasia
    • ocular rosacea
    • trauma 

    It is particularly difficult to distin­guish pseudopemphigoid from the ocular manifestations of MMP, as their presentations are identical. Pseudopem­phigoid is caused by long-term use of topical ophthalmic medications such as pilocarpine, timolol, and epineph­rine, and it resolves with cessation of the agent.5 Clinical information on laterality, skin and mucous membrane involvement, associated systemic dis­eases, medication use, and the presence of specific clinical signs can aid in dis­tinguishing the etiology of cicatrizing conjunctivitis.

    Testing. In addition to clinical signs, a conjunctival biopsy sent to a pathol­ogy lab capable of performing direct immunofluorescence testing is used for definitive diagnosis. Conjunctival biopsy of an involved area, typically the inferior conjunctival fornix, is recommended, but biopsies of active oral lesions may also be taken. Linear staining of the epithelial basement membrane zone is consistent with diagnosis of MMP. A biopsy yielding negative immunohistochemical results has been reported in up to 60% of cases that were clinically consistent with the disease and its evolution. Negative biop­sy results can be attributed to inflam­matory destruction of the subepithelial membrane or therapies used prior to biopsy.6

    Table 1: Signs and Symptoms of MMP With Ocular Involvement

    Category Nonspecific Signs/Symptoms
    General Tearing, burning, light sensitivity, foreign body sensation
    Conjunctival Diffuse hyperemia, papillary reaction, keratoconjunctivitis sicca
    Corneal Punctate epithelial erosions, exposure keratitis, epithelial defects, peripheral infiltrates, ulcers, vascularization
    Palpebral Blepharitis, trichiasis, entropion, lagophthalmos

    Management

    A multidisciplinary team that includes specialists in other medical fields such as rheumatology, hematology/oncol­ogy, and dermatology can be useful in managing MMP with ocular involve­ment, particularly its concurrent sys­temic symptoms. Such specialists can also contribute expertise in the use of systemic immunomodulatory agents, which are typically required to control MMP.

    Topical therapy. Topical treatments such as artificial tears, punctal occlusion, steroids, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine A are useful adjuncts for relief of ocular surface disease symptoms. However, they have little effect in halting disease progression.

    Systemic medications. Systemic anti-inflammatory and immunomod­ulatory medications are the mainstay of treatment for MMP with ocular involvement. A stepwise approach to systemic agents is taken depending on the severity of disease, presence of sight-threatening complications, and adverse effects of medications. The main categories of systemic agents are alkylating agents, antimetabolites, bio­logic immune modulators, interleukins, and T-cell inhibitors.

    In mild ocular disease, dapsone is a common first-line anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agent. Its adverse effects, which include gastroin­testinal distress, anemia, hepatotoxicity, and leukopenia, can decrease adherence to treatment. Sulfapyridine and sulfasalazine are alternate first-line agents that have a lower adverse effects profile.

    In mild to moderate ocular disease, mycophenolate mofetil is an effective and well-tolerated first-line antimetabolite agent for patients without sight-threatening complications. Methotrex­ate is another antimetabolite that has been recommended as a first-line agent because of its efficacy; however, it has more significant side effects, the most serious of which include hepatic and pulmonary fibrosis.

    In moderate to severe ocular disease, or in patients whose disease is refractory to an adequate trial of first-line agents, systemic corticosteroids with concurrent immunosuppressives are commonly used. Cyclophospha­mide, an alkylating agent, typically in combination with corticosteroids, is a mainstay for patients who have severe disease with sight-threatening complications. However, it should be used judiciously because of its serious adverse effects, including pancytopenia and hepatotoxicity.

    In severe refractory ocular disease, or in those with serious adverse reactions to prior levels of treatment, biologics such as etanercept, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin are used.6 Finally, a recent study found repository corticotropin to be a well-tolerated alternate or adjunctive treatment in severe refractory MMP with ocular involvement.7

    Surgical management. It is important to note that surgery can be an inciting factor for further cycles of inflammation and cicatrization. There­fore, it is important to adequately con­trol active inflammation with medical therapy before proceeding with surgery.

    Adjunctive surgical treatments for the sequelae of MMP with ocular involvement include eyelash epilation, entropion repair, tarsorrhaphy, and am­niotic membrane graft. Procedures for more severe disease include limbal stem cell transplantation, mucous membrane autografts, and cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation. The latter has been shown to be effective in treat­ment of ocular surface disease second­ary to limbal stem cell deficiency.8

    In end-stage ocular disease, corneal transplants tend to fail due to graft vas­cularization. However, some evidence supports the utility of keratoprostheses, particularly the Boston keratoprosthesis type II, in select patients.9

    Table 2: Two Different Staging Systems for MMP With Ocular Involvement

    Stage Foster System:
    Clinical Signs
    Mondino and Brown System:
    Forniceal Depth Loss
    1 Subconjunctival scarring and fibrosis <25%
    2 Forniceal shortening 25%-50%
    3 Symblepharon formation 50%-75%
    4 Ankyloblepharon formation; corneal opacification >75%

    Prognosis

    Progression of ocular disease has been reported in 20% to 30% of patients undergoing systemic therapy.10 It is important to monitor progression with close interdisciplinary follow-up employing serial photos and detailed clinical documentation. Of note, a significant percentage of patients with MMP with ocular involvement demon­strate a clear and quiet conjunctiva despite clinical and histologic evidence of fibrotic progression. This makes management difficult, as injection cannot be used as a sign of disease activity.1 It has been proposed that monitoring inflammatory markers such as myeloperoxidase could be a quantitative way to track disease activity.11

    Conclusion

    When untreated, MMP with ocular involvement can progress to blindness. Upon diagnosis, a lifelong multidis­ciplinary, stepwise management plan with frequent periodic monitoring should be undertaken for symptom relief, suppression of progression, and treatment of sequelae.

    ___________________________

    1 Radford CF et al. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(9):1199-1208.

    2 Georgoudis P et al. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(1):5-17.

    3 Foster CS. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:527-663.

    4 Elder MJ et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(4):292-296.

    5 Thorne JE et al. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(1):45-52.

    6 Fremont F et al. Cornea. 2019;38(11):1406-1411.

    7 Sharon Y et al. Cornea. 2022;41(1):45-51.

    8 Cabral JV et al. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):301.

    9 Pujari S et al. Cornea. 2011;30(12):1298-1303.

    10 Labowsky MT et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:48-55.

    11 Arafat SN et al. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):79-87.

    ___________________________

    The authors thank Irwin Leventer for his contri­bution to this article. Mr. Leventer is a medical student, Dr. Geevarghese is an ophthalmology resident, and Dr. Kim is an oculoplastic surgeon and assistant professor of ophthalmology; all are at the New York University Grossman School of Medicine, in New York, N.Y. Financial disclosures: None.