The global surgical package bundles payment for a procedure with related preoperative care (after the decision to operate), intraoperative services, and postoperative care. Procedures are classified as having a 0-day, 10-day, or 90-day global period depending on the procedure type and typical postoperative care involved.
CMS has repeatedly stated its belief that global surgical codes are overvalued because the operating surgeon (or another provider in the surgeon’s group practice) is not always performing all the postoperative visits included in the global surgical package. Thanks to the advocacy efforts of the Academy and Surgical Coalition, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) barred CMS from eliminating 10- and 90-day global surgical payments, which the agency deemed misvalued. Instead, the law authorized CMS to collect data on such services from a representative sample of physicians to review the valuation of surgical codes. In response, CMS began collecting postoperative visit data from group practices in nine states: Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nevada, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, and Rhode Island. Since July 1, 2017, affected providers must report CPT code 99024, Postoperative visit, on Part B claims for surgical procedures with 10-day or 90-day global periods.
In 2021, CMS finalized substantial increases to the office and outpatient E/M codes (99202–99215) — but declined to apply the same increase to the equivalent postoperative E/M visits valued within global surgical packages. This created a structural payment inequity: CMS pays more for the same E/M service when it is billed outside a global surgical package than inside one. CMS has refused to correct this inequity in subsequent rulemaking cycles despite consistent RUC recommendations to do so. Instead of resolving the inequity, CMS has repeatedly deferred to policies around data collection. The Academy continues to push Congress and CMS to restore parity.