Use of Eye Care by Adults at High Risk of Vision Loss
By Lynda Seminara
Selected and Reviewed By: Neil M. Bressler, MD, and Deputy Editors
Journal Highlights
JAMA Ophthalmology, May 2020
Download PDF
Saydah et al. compared the number of U.S. adults at high risk for vision loss and the use of eye care services in 2002 and 2017. They found that more adults were at high risk for vision loss in 2017 than in 2002. However, while more adults received eye care in 2017, the percentage who could not afford eyeglasses was higher in 2017.
For this study, the authors gathered data from two National Health Interview Surveys. Covariates included demographics, health insurance status, vision or eye problems (age-related macular degeneration, cataract, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, or an eye injury), and the presence of diabetes. Main outcome measures were self-reports of having done the following in the preceding 12 months: 1) visiting an eye care professional, 2) undergoing a dilated eye exam, and 3) needing eyeglasses but being unable to afford them. Respondents who were unable to see or were younger than 18 years of age were excluded from the analysis.
Participants who were deemed at high risk for vision loss were those ≥65 years of age and those with a diabetes diagnosis or eye/vision problem. Assessment methods included multivariable logistic regression and temporal comparisons (2002 vs. 2017) derived from estimates standardized to the 2010 census population.
In 2017, more than 93 million U.S. adults were at high risk for vision loss, up from almost 65 million in 2002. For this study, of the 30,920 eligible respondents in 2002, 16% were at least 65 years old, compared with 20% of the 32,886 respondents in 2017. Fifty-two percent of both samples were female.
Although use of eye care services was greater in 2017 than in 2002 (visit: 56.9% vs. 51.1%; dilated exam: 59.8% vs. 52.4%), so was the percentage of individuals who could not afford eyeglasses (8.7% vs. 8.3%). This finding was more pronounced for low-income participants.
The original article can be found here.