Meta-Analysis of Preoperative OCT Features in RDs
By Jean Shaw
Selected by Andrew P. Schachat, MD
Journal Highlights
Ophthalmology Retina, May 2023
Download PDF
Murtaza et al. set out to evaluate the prognostic relationship between preoperative features of retinal detachments (RDs) as noted on OCT scans and postoperative visual outcomes. They found that four features—greater height of retinal detachment (HRD), disruption of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and/or the external limiting membrane (ELM), presence of intraretinal cystic cavities (ICCs), and macular detachment—were associated with poor visual recovery and post-op VA, although the quality of the evidence was low. They also proposed a standardized nomenclature for reporting preoperative RD OCT features for future studies.
For this meta-analysis, the researchers extracted data from 29 studies. All told, 1,670 patients (1,671 eyes) were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the association between six preoperative OCT findings in RDs and postoperative VA. The participants’ average age was 55 ± 6.42 years. At baseline, 89.4% of eyes had a macula-off RD, and 80.3% had a primary RD. The average duration of detachment was 15.1 ± 9.9 days, and the average duration of follow-up after surgery was 15.4 ± 9.8 months (range, 1-30 months). Most eyes (62%) underwent pars plana vitrectomy.
Two features—outer retinal corrugations and central macular thickness (CMT)—had no bearing on post-op VA. A greater HRD at the fovea was only weakly associated with a poorer postoperative VA. Preoperative disruption of the EZ and/or ELM, the presence of ICCs, and the presence of macular detachment were significantly associated with poor post-op VA, ranging from a difference of 2 to 3 Snellen lines. All associations had a low quality of evidence, with CMT being of very low quality.
Because of inconsistencies in the literature regarding the classification and measurement of OCT features, the authors also proposed a nomenclature and classification system for common pre-op features seen on OCT in RDs. This system is meant to “guide and promote consistency in future studies,” the authors wrote.
The original article can be found here.