Computer Vision Syndrome: Current Management Is Inadequate
By Lynda Seminara
Selected by Russell N. Van Gelder, MD, PhD
Journal Highlights
Ophthalmology, October 2022
Download PDF
Singh et al. investigated interventions to treat eyestrain related to use of digital devices, often dubbed “computer vision syndrome” (CVS). Among the therapies that have been used for CVS, none showed high evidence of efficacy, but low-level evidence suggests that oral supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids may be somewhat helpful.
The authors began this work by identifying appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from multiple registries. For the analysis, interventions were grouped by the following categories: optical aids, complementary medicine and nutritional supplements, artificial tears, environmental modification, ergonomic adjustment, visual hygiene, binocular vision training, and other. Complementary medicine and nutritional supplements were further subclassified as oral berry extract, polyunsaturated fatty-acid supplements, antioxidant supplements, traditional medicine, combination supplements, or other interventions. The studies were appraised for risk of bias and evidence of certainty; the latter was judged according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.
Forty-five RCTs were included, representing nearly 4,500 participants. The analyses showed that multifocal lenses were no better than single-vision lenses for reducing visual fatigue, with low-level certainty at best. Low-certainty evidence also indicated that blue-blocking spectacles did not help to alleviate eyestrain. Compared with placebo, oral supplementation with berry extract did not improve visual fatigue or dry eye symptoms, nor did it have a significant effect on critical flicker-fusion frequency (CFF) or accommodative amplitude. Relative to placebo, low-certainty evidence suggested that dry eye symptoms improve with 45 to 90 days of oral omega-3 supplements. Oral carotenoid supplementation improved CFF in comparison to placebo, but whether this finding is significant is unclear, said the authors.
None of the evidence was of sufficient quality to support routine use of any of the reported interventions as treatment for CVS, said the authors, who also noted that methodology varied widely among the studies.
The original article can be found here.